Feb 8, 2015 | 2 minutes read
Developing python application using minimalist frameworks has become frequent in the Python community, for no reasons not to speak here. I see this change as a professional development where developers want to choose what is best for your application, simply use what little hide a group *(of pearls, or not*) that is better.
Along with this evolution brings vices of many developers other frameworks (and/or technology), this can be a problem at the time of the taking of decision of which Python web framework to use.
I am a member of the team that keeps the Bottle Framework and thinking of a better acceptance of the framework decided to create the bottle-boilerplate, a project that creates a scaffold using the structure of the bottle and its best practices on top of design pattern MVC, thus simplifying the bootstrap starting a web application.
The process failed use the simplest possible:
pip install bottle-boilerplate bottle startproject YOU-PROJECT-NAME
If you want to open the documentation from the bottle:
The bottle-boilerplate is an open source project and accept what you want contribution (which come to improve the project). Is an interface (command line) to the cookiecutter-bottle, i.e. bottle-boilerplate on startproject will call cookiecutter to create the application.
We need the contribution in cookiecutter-bottle to improve the application for example, write test, among other improvements. Send pull request free Synthase (PR).comments powered by Disqus