<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Metrics on Thiago Avelino</title><link>https://avelino.run/tags/metrics/</link><description>Recent content in Metrics on Thiago Avelino</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>© Avelino</copyright><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 13:16:59 -0300</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://avelino.run/tags/metrics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Vanity Metrics in Engineering, From Lines of Code to AI-Generated Percentages</title><link>https://avelino.run/vanity-metrics-engineering/</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://avelino.run/vanity-metrics-engineering/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator, announced that 25% of Winter 2025 startups had 95% of their code generated by AI. The internet applauded. I read it twice to make sure that was actually the claim.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;% of code generated by AI&amp;quot; is a vanity metric. It is not the first one in the history of engineering, and it will not be the last. But it is the first to be narrated publicly by one of the Valley's most influential outlets as if it were a benchmark of technical maturity. That is where it becomes a problem.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>